The Ocean and the Hourglass, by Dan O’Brien
This was a self-published novel on Kindle. I wanted to like it. I read the description and reviews, and I was interested enough that I requested a review copy from the author. Unfortunately, I couldn’t like it. I could barely finish it. Problems abound, many of which are particular peeves of mine.
First, the writing. It needs work. From the first page, the writing feels like a classroom exercise (e.g. “describe a scene in as much detail as you can, using at least 5 similes”). One reason it feels like that: excessive use of adjectives. Almost every noun has an adjective attached, and this really bogs down the prose. There is also inappropriate AND redundant descriptive word choice (e.g. “gales” of wind “assaulted” the characters at least four times, seemingly regardless of how hard the wind was blowing.)
Second, pervasive sense of wish fulfillment. The story is about a nerdy boy whose reality is tough and unsatisfying, so he escapes into an awesome fantasy world where he is a hero. Am I reading about a character, or a fantasized version of the author? I couldn’t tell, and that bothers me in literature.
Third, philosophical lecturing. Our hero actually sits down with a mentor for a Q&A session about Ethics 101. I’d rather read a textbook than listen to characters recite the concepts. I wish that instead the author had presented the concepts with more “show” than “tell” – for instance, letting the main character have an experience that causes him to learn / realize a concept, rather than just listening to a speech about it.
Finally, unsatisfying “too-easy” resolution. The main character realizes that he has created the entire world with his imagination, and thus has complete control over what happens. He can depose the evil tyrant just by wishing it. However, he refuses to become a “tyrant” himself afterwards, and instead turns over the reins to a sexy princess he’s been traveling with. Why does he believe that installing a sexy monarch is going to make things better? I’m not sure. I felt this ending just came out of nowhere, it wasn’t even really related to the philosophical lecturing mentioned above.